[Netarchivesuite-devel] Analysing first stage

Søren Vejrup Carlsen svc at kb.dk
Wed May 12 15:54:36 CEST 2010


Hi Sara.
No, we haven't seen this problem here.
Did you have any problem creating the domains in NetarchiveSuite. It could be that they weren't created in the first place?

Best regards
Søren

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: netarchivesuite-devel-bounces at lists.gforge.statsbiblioteket.dk [mailto:netarchivesuite-devel-bounces at lists.gforge.statsbiblioteket.dk] På vegne af sara.aubry at bnf.fr
Sendt: 12. maj 2010 15:48
Til: netarchivesuite-devel at lists.gforge.statsbiblioteket.dk; bja at statsbiblioteket.dk
Emne: [Netarchivesuite-devel] Analysing first stage

Hello everyone,

Our first stage finally completed on Monday 10 and lasted longer than expected (we started on April 14).
We collected 1000 URL on 1 673 094 domains, using 4 063  031 seeds.

Our main figures:
- Number of jobs: 497 (among which 17 failed and were resubmitted)
- Number of crawled URL: 294 387 919
- Number of crawled hosts: 3 234 464
- Number of ARC files: 107 173
- Size of compressed ARC files: 10,44 Tb

75 424 domains reached the max object limit and will be part of the second stage we will launch on May 17.

While QAing our first stage and crossing figures, we noticed that 3 496 domains (all starting with an s) were missing from the historyinfo table and were not harvested at all.

Looking quickly at the missing domain list, we first thought that NAS didn't like porn sites :-) (many domain names with sex, sexy...) but the list is larger than that.
There are no errors in the GUIApplication log file, nor in the DB log file.

This is no big deal, only 0.2% of the entire seed list, and we will just run a patch crawl.
But have you ever had this problem?

Best,

Sara




Avant d'imprimer, pensez ? l'environnement.   




More information about the Netarchivesuite-devel mailing list